The pure effects of geographic range size, trophic variables and geographic location of taxa are negligible, but the shared effects between the three groups of variables account for important portions of the variation the whole model explains 64% of the variance. Morphological variables are not statistically significant in explaining the variation in the year of description, whereas trophic and geographic variables are essential determinants. General Regression Models and variation partitioning were used to assess the influence on the process of species description of body size and colour, trophic range, number of host plants, geographic range size, maximum and minimum latitude and longitude. In order to optimise this taxonomic work, several morphologic, trophic and geographic variables of Aphthona species were analysed, in a search for the factors that have influenced the probability of discovery of taxa and thus to estimate the characteristics of the yet-to-be-described species. The historic species accumulation curve shows no asymptotic trend so no accurate estimations could be made of the number of species to be discovered in the future, but the shape of the curve indicates that a significant proportion of the taxa remains yet-to-be-described and thus further taxonomic effort will be needed. The degree of completeness of the western Palaearctic inventory of the genus Aphthona and the factors that have determined the process of species description in the region were analysed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |